Purpose
Are scope, outcomes, success criteria, and the required leadership decision unambiguous?
The PrimeGrid Five-Gate method
The method examines the project as a delivery system, identifies the conditions that can stop execution, and turns each material finding into an owned decision or action.
Five gates
Are scope, outcomes, success criteria, and the required leadership decision unambiguous?
Do schedule, design maturity, procurement, permitting, outage, and commissioning logic form one credible baseline?
Can the work be accessed, staffed, supervised, constructed, tested, and restored under actual operating conditions?
Are every owner, utility, engineer, vendor, constructor, agency, and stakeholder handoff understood and assigned?
Can leaders detect drift, force decisions, close actions, and recover the work before exposure compounds?
The review sequence
Illustrative readiness view
Illustration only. Ratings are evidence-based and tailored to the project decision.
Typical deliverables
The decision, bottom line, material exposures, and immediate leadership actions.
A consistent view of ready, conditional, and at-risk execution conditions.
Prioritized findings with consequence, evidence, owner, and required decision date.
Near-term closeout actions and the proof required to advance the project.
What this is not
PrimeGrid does not replace stamped design authority or direct the engineer’s technical scope.
The focus is execution credibility, field conditions, interfaces, and decision exposure—not routine administration.
The review is built to uncover hard truths early and create accountable action, not validate a preferred narrative.
Put the project through the gates
A focused review can be shaped around a board decision, federal milestone, NTP, mobilization, outage, energization, or recovery baseline.